Lithuanian Life- Quality of Public services

Lithuanian Life- Quality of Public services

1. Introduction

Eurofound provides research, data and analysis on a wide range of social and work-related topics. This information is largely comparative, but also offers country-specific information for each of the 28 EU Member States. Most information is available in English but some has been translated to facilitate access at national level.

Eurofound strives to strengthen the ongoing link between its own work and national policy debates and priorities related to quality of life and work. Increasingly important in this context is the Europe 2020 growth and jobs strategy launched in 2010, which has five headline targets, covering employment through to social inclusion and poverty reduction. The strategy is implemented in the context of the European Semester process – the EU’s annual cycle of economic policy guidance and surveillance – which ensures that Member States keep their budgetary and economic policies in line with their EU commitments through, in part, National Reform Programmes.

 

European Commission: The European Semester

European Commission: The European Semester – EU country-specific recommendations

European Commission: European Semester documents for Lithuania

 

2. Living in Lithuania
country-level data from the European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS)

2.4. Quality of public services
Quality ratings for seven public services

Note: scale of 1-10, Source: EQLS 2016.

 

The perceived quality of many public services has increased in Lithuania in the recent years of observation in the EQLS. For instance, the perceived quality of health services increased from 5.1 in 2003 to 6.3 in 2016, but was still lower than the EU28 average of 6.7 in 2016 (on a scale of 1–10). Similarly, the perceived quality of public transport increased from 6.3 in 2003 to 7.0 in 2016, rising above the EU28 average of 6.6. However, the perceived quality of the state pension system has decreased in Lithuania from 5.0 in 2003 to 3.8 in 2016, which is also lower than the EU28 average of 5.0.

Share this post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *